• Order An Inspection
  • Free Estimate
  • Local Service Areas
Search:
1-888-874-6773
Home
Home › Blogs › Bill Zoller's blog › Federal Pacific Panels and Associated Danger

Federal Pacific Panels and Associated Danger

Submitted by Bill Zoller on Mon, 09/14/2009 - 11:02am
in
  • Other Posts by: Bill Zoller
  • Topic: Hot Technical Topics
  • Topic: Inspection Industry

I was in Grand Lake today with a friend, looking at a cabin he’s thinking about buying ... lo and behold, another FPE panel with Stab-Lok breakers!

After conducting several property inspections this summer and finding the dreaded Federal Pacific Electrical Panel (FPE) with Stab-LOK breakers, I became aware that the real estate community, in this part of the country at least, has many different impressions of the degree of seriousness and the implications of this style of electrical service.

In discussing the only option with this type of electrical setup, replacement, I realized there are many realtors, and possibly home inspectors, that believe modification of the panel or approval by a licensed electrician is a legitimate response.

This is simply not the case, and I have included in this document justification, and additional resources for the reader’s education. There is extensive documentation on the internet, but the foremost author on the subject appears to be Dr. Jesse Aronstein, Consulting Engineer, Poughkeepsie, NY. His latest document was updated on May 25, 2007 and is posted here.

fpe panel

The findings clearly support “the conclusion that virtually every FPE Stab-Lok panel installed in homes today contains circuit breakers that are seriously defective, and should be replaced in the interest of electrical and fire safety.”

In brief, FPE panels with Stab-Lok breakers were manufactured from roughly 1950 to the early 80’s. It has been estimated that some 28 million panels were installed across the USA. It was suspected in 1980, earlier testing results used to obtain UL listing for the product were seriously flawed and did not meet the UL safety standard requirements. Basically, fraud was committed by FPE in logging the testing data for the express purpose of obtaining UL approval. Hence, a defective product had been introduced into the marketplace in large fashion. The nature of the defect was not limited to the breaker(s), but included the design of the panel as well.

Eventually, the FPE product was de-listed from UL and the product is currently described as a “latent safety hazard”. However, the decision has not been clearly communicated to the field and some persons in the trade may claim that the FPE Stab-Lok system is in conformance with NEC, State, and local code because it was at the time of installation. This is simply not true. The defective performance of the product is not in actual compliance with any electrical safety code.

I encourage each person reading this document to go to the links I’ve included and do further research. And, please communicate to your business community, as a realtor, home inspector, electrician, handyman, etc., the presence of these types of panels must be removed/replaced. No other remedy is satisfactory.

Check out these links for additional info: 

http://www.inspect-ny.com/fpe/FPE_Panel_ID9.htm
http://www.inspect-ny.com/fpe/
http://www.rockymountainelectric.org/fpe.html
http://www.kngelectricalservices.com/services/residential/fpe-circuit-pa...

 

 

  • Bill Zoller's blog

Comments

Federal Pacific Panels with STAB-Lok Breakers

Submitted by William Zoller (not verified) on Wed, 10/14/2009 - 11:36am.

As anticpated, today, I received a call from a Master Electrician, 35 years in the trade that informed me I was wrong to call for replacement of the FPE sub-panel with Stab-Lok breakers.  The inspection that spurred his comments was a condo unit in a very large complex that is wholly wired with FPE product.  His argument?  It's okay to purchase and install a modified breaker, thus doing a valid 'repair'.  He did not allude to any inherent problems with the structure of the panel and seemed to think replacing a breaker or two would fix the problem.  Also, he wanted to know why other inspectors evaluating other condo units had not called for replacement. 

I have referred him to the literature and research of Dr. Jesse Aronstein, which, in my interpretation, leaves no room for modification.  To date, Dr. Jesse's summation seems to be the most valid.  If there's someone else out there that's willing to stand up against Dr. Aronstein, I'd sure be willing to listen.

  • reply

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • You may use <swf file="song.mp3"> to display Flash files inline

More information about formatting options

  • Home Page
  • Residential
  • Relocation
  • Commercial
  • Resources For You
  • Videos
  • Blog

Home Inspection Blog

Blog Topics

  • Commercial Investment Market
  • Home Maintenance and Safety
  • Hot Technical Topics
  • Human Qualities
  • Inspection Industry
  • Market Commentary
  • Radon and Environmental
  • Scrapbook
  • Tales From the Road
  • Technical Jargon
  • Unique Properties
  • What's Wrong with This Picture?

Blog Authors

  • Alan Gould
  • Bill Bowman
  • Bill Zoller
  • Chrissy Doremus
  • Dan Schenkel
  • David Rothbart
  • Faith Greenwell
  • Gordon Glidden
  • Martin Smith
  • Paul Picard
  • Paul Tooley

Similar Entries

  • Top Five Failed Building Practices: Part 4 of 5 Federal Pacific "Stab-Lok" Electrical Panels
  • Federal Pacific Panels and Associated Danger - continued
  • Top Five Failed Building Practices: Part 5 of 5 Asbestos Insulation
  • Top Five Failed Building Practices: Part 1 of 5 Aluminum Branch Wiring
  • What's Wrong with this Picture: Precarious Positioning

Subscribe Via RSS

Subscribe with Google

Subscribe By Email:

Receive Future Posts By Email:

Your Email will never be shared

Recent Comments:

  • Love it
    15 hours 26 min ago
  • Simple & Elegant
    15 hours 29 min ago
  • "First of all, I hear people
    18 hours 23 min ago
  • Inconsistencies Never Cease to Amaze me!
    1 day 7 hours ago
  • disposals
    1 day 11 hours ago
  • Smelly Dishwasher
    1 day 16 hours ago
  • HOME STAR
    1 day 22 hours ago
  • Furnace Filter
    1 day 22 hours ago
  • About the plants
    2 days 16 hours ago
  • I think our filter is as dirty as that
    2 days 16 hours ago

Get Our Widget!

Provided by: U.S. Inspect Home Inspections

 

U.S. Inspect ~ Professional Home Inspections (U.S. Inspect): Inspector in Chantilly, VA

 

Client Login

About Us

Learn more about U.S. Inspect and Commercial Assessments.

Latest News

Read about the latest U.S. Inspect and Industry News.

U.S. Inspect Blog

See what the industry professionals are talking about.

  • Home
  • |
  • Residential
  • |
  • Relocation
  • |
  • Commercial
  • |
  • Contact Us
  • Residential Resources
  • |
  • Home Inspection Service Areas
©2010 U.S. Inspect. All Rights Reserved