Federal Pacific Panels and Associated Danger
I was in Grand Lake today with a friend, looking at a cabin he’s thinking about buying ... lo and behold, another FPE panel with Stab-Lok breakers!
After conducting several property inspections this summer and finding the dreaded Federal Pacific Electrical Panel (FPE) with Stab-LOK breakers, I became aware that the real estate community, in this part of the country at least, has many different impressions of the degree of seriousness and the implications of this style of electrical service.
In discussing the only option with this type of electrical setup, replacement, I realized there are many realtors, and possibly home inspectors, that believe modification of the panel or approval by a licensed electrician is a legitimate response.
This is simply not the case, and I have included in this document justification, and additional resources for the reader’s education. There is extensive documentation on the internet, but the foremost author on the subject appears to be Dr. Jesse Aronstein, Consulting Engineer, Poughkeepsie, NY. His latest document was updated on May 25, 2007 and is posted here.

The findings clearly support “the conclusion that virtually every FPE Stab-Lok panel installed in homes today contains circuit breakers that are seriously defective, and should be replaced in the interest of electrical and fire safety.”
In brief, FPE panels with Stab-Lok breakers were manufactured from roughly 1950 to the early 80’s. It has been estimated that some 28 million panels were installed across the USA. It was suspected in 1980 that earlier testing results used to obtain UL listing for the product were seriously flawed and did not meet the UL safety standard requirements. Basically, fraud was committed by FPE in logging the testing data for the express purpose of obtaining UL approval. Hence, a defective product had been introduced into the marketplace in large fashion. The nature of the defect was not limited to the breaker(s), but included the design of the panel as well.
Eventually, the FPE product was de-listed from UL, and is currently described as a “latent safety hazard”. However, the decision has not been clearly communicated to the field and some persons in the trade may claim that the FPE Stab-Lok system is in conformance with NEC, State, and local code because it was at the time of installation. This is simply not true. The defective performance of the product is not in actual compliance with any electrical safety code.
I encourage each person reading this document to go to the links I’ve included and do further research. And, please communicate to your business community, as a realtor, home inspector, electrician, handyman, etc., the presence of these types of panels must be removed/replaced. No other remedy is satisfactory.
Check out these links for additional info:
http://www.inspect-ny.com/fpe/FPE_Panel_ID9.htm
http://www.inspect-ny.com/fpe/
http://www.rockymountainelectric.org/fpe.html
http://www.kngelectricalservices.com/services/residential/fpe-circuit-pa...

Comments
FPE Panels Have Not Been Manufactured Sinc Early '80s
Matt,
You should not be able to find any 'new' FPE panels in the marketplace today. Even if one has been sitting on the shelf for the last 30 years, it wouldn't meet current electrical code for several reasons. Universal Laboratories, likewise, does not recognize this panel as valid or safe. For further info, check this link. Lastly, please take time to read the detailed research from Dr. Jesse Aronstein, Consulting Engineer and foremost authority on this subject. You will find the report at this link as well.
I thought with the inclusion
I thought with the inclusion of RCAs these things are obsolete by now. Are these FPEs still allowed to be sold?
Regards,
Matt
Hardwood Flooring Vancouver Canada
I had no idea about this
I had no idea about this issue. I'm very glad that I read this article. My husband and I just bought a new house, so this is definitely something that we will need to look into. I haven't looked at the links that you attached with the article yet, but I'm thinking about just finding an electrician and bringing it up to him anyway. We don't have an electrician that we go to in this area yet, so I will be looking at electrician reviews to find someone that I like. Thanks again!
Tami Putnam
FPE is obsolete
Thank you for your comments. I've heard this many times. Licensed electricians will state that the FPE concern is misunderstood or overrated. I have read everything Dr. Aronstein has written concerning this topic. I find no room for questioning. FPE must be defected and replaced. Thank you for commenting.
Hmm! I wont make a direct
Hmm! I wont make a direct comment, but I will add that we now have available digital connections for all of our energy uses. No wiring. Yes, we require technicians but, this is a much safer, greener alternative, than having wires running through your entire building or home. Consider the possibilities.
Regards,
John
Fairy Lights
Federal Pacific Panels with STAB-Lok Breakers
As anticpated, today, I received a call from a Master Electrician, 35 years in the trade that informed me I was wrong to call for replacement of the FPE sub-panel with Stab-Lok breakers. The inspection that spurred his comments was a condo unit in a very large complex that is wholly wired with FPE product. His argument? It's okay to purchase and install a modified breaker, thus doing a valid 'repair'. He did not allude to any inherent problems with the structure of the panel and seemed to think replacing a breaker or two would fix the problem. Also, he wanted to know why other inspectors evaluating other condo units had not called for replacement.
I have referred him to the literature and research of Dr. Jesse Aronstein, which, in my interpretation, leaves no room for modification. To date, Dr. Jesse's summation seems to be the most valid. If there's someone else out there that's willing to stand up against Dr. Aronstein, I'd sure be willing to listen.