• Order An Inspection
  • Free Estimate
  • Local Service Areas
Search:
1-888-874-6773
Home
  • Residental Services
  • Relocation Services
  • Commercial Services
Home › Blogs › Alan Gould's blog › Top Five Failed Building Practices: Part 2 of 5 Fire-Retardant Treated Plywood

Top Five Failed Building Practices: Part 2 of 5 Fire-Retardant Treated Plywood

 

Here is the second installment of the five-part series, The Top five Failed Building Practices. You can read Part 1: Aluminum Branch Wiring here.


Part 2: Fire-Retardant Treated Plywood

The second item on our list of the Top Five Failed Building Practices is Fire-Retardant Treated Plywood.

Townhouses and other connected homes are generally built with firebreaks to keep flames from spreading between units. Traditionally, before 1970, a brick or cement block wall would separate the homes and extend up beyond the roofline. This is known as a parapet wall.

This type of divider wall is still being used, but since the 1970s, many townhouses have shared a roofline without parapet walls. Instead, fire protection is supposed to come from the construction methods used between the units.

These methods vary, but modern firewalls often consist of a six-inch-wide, insulated metal framed wall with doubled sheet rock on both sides. A problem arose, however, when builders used fire-retardant treated plywood (FRT) in attics as roof decking between the units. This was not meant as a cost-cutting measure, but rather as a way to complete the firebreak.

Fire-resistant wood products for various industries have been around for  decades, but this roof decking is more recent and was commonly used in townhouses and condominiums in the 1970s and 1980s.

FRT plywood is made by forcing inorganic salts deep into the wood fibers, then drying the plywood. The chemicals reduce the chance of fire spreading to other units because the plywood will char during a fire but not burst into flame. The product tested and performed well for reducing the spread of fire.

However, there are two other kinds of problems. Both have to do with heat and humidity. When FRT plywood is installed in poorly ventilated attics, the highly acidic chemicals can leach out of the wood and degrade metal fasteners, including the roof nails and truss plates used to hold the roof structure in place.
The same fire retardant chemicals can also react with high heat and cause the wood itself to degrade, dry prematurely and fail. The plywood can become so dry and brittle that it would be unsafe to walk on. It can cause the roof to leak. In some cases, FRT plywood has failed in just a few years, when the house was still relatively new.

FRT plywood can best be identified in the attic. This is also the safest place to determine whether the wood has begun to deteriorate. It will be stamped or otherwise marked as fire resistant. Look at the underside of the roof decking, adjoining the firewalls. A clear indication of possible deterioration is a dramatic color change from the rest of the plywood. This product will often change to a very dark coffee or reddish color. Also, the surface can become very brittle and separate easily when probed with a screwdriver.

Severely deteriorated FRT plywood must be replaced, but there are ways to delay replacing less-damaged surfaces. One way is to add a layer of drywall to the attic side of the plywood. This and other methods, however, will only delay the inevitable removal of deteriorated plywood, usually when the roof shingles are being replaced.

There are newer versions of FRT plywood, but most builders now have incorporated the drywall method into their firebreak construction.

----

Next up: Part 3: Polybutylene Pipes.

Read Part 1: Aluminum Branch Wiring

Submitted by Alan Gould on Tue, 01/26/2010 - 11:01am
  • Other Posts by: Alan Gould
  • Home Buying

Comments

Shouldn't there be a

Submitted by Matt Kent (not verified) on Mon, 03/21/2011 - 2:06am.

Shouldn't there be a legislation in place on for all wood building materials to be FRT?

Regards,

Matt

Flooring Winston Salem

FRT makes for a fine building

Submitted by Paul Salisbury (not verified) on Thu, 03/17/2011 - 8:59pm.

FRT makes for a fine building material when safety from fire is your priority, but as you pointed out the chemicals involved make it not the best choice for general construction.

Regards,

Paul

Conservatories

Interesting. What I would

Submitted by Henry Grace (not verified) on Thu, 01/13/2011 - 10:17pm.

Interesting. What I would like to know is how do builders remain on top of the ever changing legislations and issues pertainint to sound building practices?

Regards,

Henry

Building Security

I seconded drywalls and wall

Submitted by Kath Vent (not verified) on Wed, 11/24/2010 - 3:50am.

I seconded drywalls and wall cavity closing as the best method for fire prevention. Wood and fire simply go well together as a pair, treated or not, and I won’t leave it as that for fire safety.

Regards,

Kath Vent

Soffits and Fascias

Your local builder.

Submitted by Seane Threeks (not verified) on Sun, 09/26/2010 - 8:58pm.
There are many alternatives to ensure best safety I would personally seek advice from your local builder and or timber merchant.

Inconsistencies Never Cease to Amaze me!

Submitted by Janice (not verified) on Wed, 09/01/2010 - 3:18am.
This is interesting that some buildings do not have the fire divider wall as my property, which is a corner shop and house dwelling, has such a wall and we had proposed to open up the home. We were informed that if we did this we would not be able to operate as a commercial corner shop. Yet reading this it appears that many building were in fact buiilt without a divider and we live in the entire house/shop. Inconsistencies never cease to amaze me. Commercial Steel Buildings

Alternatives to FRT plywood and drywall fire breaks

Submitted by Dean Schinnerer (not verified) on Tue, 03/09/2010 - 2:04pm.
There are alternatives to using FRT plywood, one is a product called No Burn Plus Mih which also incorporates a black mold inhibitor.  We have been making some headway with the building and safety departments in California as an alternative solution.  This product will not break down the plywood.  For more information, go to www.noburnpacifc.com.  
  • Home Page
  • Residential
  • Relocation
  • Commercial
  • Homeowner Resources
  • Agent Resources
  • Blog

Blog Topics

  • Announcements & News
  • Home Buying
  • Home Selling
  • Homeownership
  • Home Tools & Resources
  • Humor
  • Meet the Team
  • Motivational Monday
  • Picture Perfect
  • Radon and Environmental
  • Tales From the Road
  • Technical Topics
  • Unique Properties

Blog Authors

  • Bill Conner
  • Emily Conner
  • Chrissy Doremus
  • Gordon Glidden
  • Faith Greenwell
  • Phil Halpin
  • Paul Picard
  • David Rothbart
  • Martin Smith
  • Paul Tooley
  • Bill Zoller

Similar Entries

  • Top Five Failed Building Practices: Part 3 of 5 Polybutylene Pipes
  • Top Five Failed Building Practices: Part 4 of 5 Federal Pacific "Stab-Lok" Electrical Panels
  • Top Five Failed Building Practices: Part 5 of 5 Asbestos Insulation
  • Top Five Failed Building Practices: Part 1 of 5 Aluminum Branch Wiring
  • Home Maintenance and Safety: Attic? Never Been Up There!

Subscribe Via RSS

Subscribe with Google

Subscribe By Email:

Receive Future Posts By Email:

Your Email will never be shared

Get Our Widget!

Provided by: U.S. Inspect Home Inspections

 

U.S. Inspect ~ Professional Home Inspections (U.S. Inspect): Inspector in Chantilly, VA

Powered by Disqus

About Us

Learn more about U.S. Inspect and Commercial Assessments.

Latest News

Read about the latest U.S. Inspect and Industry News.

U.S. Inspect Blog

See what the industry professionals are talking about.

  • Home
  • |
  • Residential Inspections
  • |
  • Commercial Inspections
  • |
  • Relocation
  • |
  • Contact Us
  • Homeowner Resources
  • |
  • Home Inspection Service Areas
  • |
  • Agent Resource Center
  • |
  • Training
  • |
  • GSA
© Copyright 2011 U.S. Inspect
Re-publishing allowed under Creative Commons license